A mutual fund is typically meant to be an easy solution to your retirement savings growing steadily over the decades, right? These investment vehicles are generally sought out for their typically diversified nature and security, but are fund managers putting that classification at stake though when they lend out the underlying holdings? It's a well-known yet contested topic in the financial community called "securities lending," and one that's not too often discussed. Securities lending, simply put A stock mutual fund or ETF will usually hold thousands of shares of different stocks. If there is a short-seller who wants to borrow those stocks and agrees to post some collateral and pay the fund a fee for doing so, a fund will lend them out and make a little extra dough. It's a clever way for fund managers to make incremental revenue. But, is there a catch? Could lending out your fund holdings actually be detrimental to your money in the long run? In short... possibly A study done by Derek Hoystermyer, a finance professor and contributor to the Wall Street Journal, found that active fund managers who’ve made it a habit of lending out north of 1% of your funds' underlying holdings in a given year eventually end up underperforming by 0.62% across multiple classes when compared to funds that don’t lend out shares. - For example, when it came to US large-cap-based funds, those that loaned out less than 1% of their holdings averaged returns of 13.29% per year, while actively managed funds that lent out more than that averaged 12.93%, or 0.36% less per year. Fund performance gets worse for those that lend out more than 2%, not to mention the fund's increased volatility.
- A 0.36% annual return different looks like a small number, but for hypothetical's sake, if you had 1 million dollars invested in both a fund that lends out less than 1% of its holding and a fund that lends out more than 1%, your average account balance difference 10 years later would be roughly $107K ($3,480,000 vs $3,373,000).
The big picture But all fund practices aren't created equal. Fund securities lending policies are not uniform across the board. For example, income earned from securities lending for certain ETFs is estimated and accrued daily into its NAV which may result in returns that can partly offset fund management fees—a potential benefit. If this seems like a matter that may be relevant for you, make sure you read the fund or fund's parent company's prospectus, semi-annual or annual report so you understand what their securities lending policy is. |
No comments:
Post a Comment